Union Avoidance at Sid’s Market (Case) Sid’s Market is an upscale supermarket that caters to a clientele living in the prosperous suburbs of Chicago’s North Shore. Although most of the supermarkets in the Chicago area are unionized, Sid’s market has been able to avoid unions by matching unionized markets’ pay and benefits. Sid Clark, founder and owner of Sid’s, has told store manager Lee Shaw that one of her top priorities should be discouraging union organization at the market. Clark is convinced that if the store is unionized, it will lose its “family” environment and become a bureaucratic, impersonal market like the other major food chains in Chicago. Recently, Shaw became aware that the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) union is attempting to organize Sid’s market. In trying to discourage the UFCW, she took the following actions to implement Sid’s union avoidance strategy:
•She monitored all employees to make sure they were not soliciting for the union on company time. She disciplined two courtesy clerks who were wearing UFCW buttons on their clothing and told them to remove the buttons. Another courtesy clerk in the store was wearing a button that said “Go Bulls” in support of the Chicago basketball team, but Shaw did not reprimand him..
•The UFCW wrote to Shaw and asked her to provide a list of the names and addresses of all the employees who work at Sid’s market. Shaw refused to do so. .
•Shaw set up small group meetings of store employees on company time to explain why Sid’s Market would be much better off without a union. .
•Shaw instructed the market’s security guards to ask the union organizers who are not employed at Sid’s to stop handing out union literature to employees as they enter and leave the market. When the union organizers ignored this request, the guards escorted them off the market property and confiscated their literature. .
A few weeks after these four incidents, Shaw received a letter from the National Labor Relations Board indicating that the UFCW had accused Sid’s market of engaging in unfair labor practices designed to prevent employees from forming a union.
Critical Thinking Questions
1.Which of these four incidents is the NLRB most likely to view as unfair labor practices? Why?.
2.Which of these four incidents is the NLRB not likely to consider unfair labor practices? Why?.
3.What could Lee Shaw have done differently to operate within the law that governs union-organizing activities?.
THE ASSIGNMENT : Fully answer the three (3) critical thinking questions.
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS :Students are to use proper grammar and correct spelling.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more