Source #1: Waxman, S. (2007). “Stars check in, Stars check out.” NY: The New York Times.1-5 Retrieved 11 June 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/17/fashion/17rehab.html
Source #2: Hill, J. (2018). Hung out to Dry; San Francisco: Mother Jones; 45-49
1. Identify the evidence used to support Source #1’s main argument.
In the textbox below, discuss the kinds of evidence used in the source to support the main argument and supporting points. Does the author use facts, statistics, experience, and/or authority? Use specific examples from the source to demonstrate the kinds of evidence he or she is relying on to support his or her argument.
Top of Form
2. Discuss the reliability of evidence used to support Source #1’s main argument.
In the textbox below, discuss how you can tell the source uses reliable evidence. What makes each kind of evidence provided in the source reliable? Use specific examples from the source to demonstrate what makes the evidence reliable.
3. Identify how evidence is used to support counterargument in Source #1.
In the textbox below, first identify where the author presents a counterargument.
Second, describe how the author rebuts the counterargument.
Third, describe the evidence used in this rebuttal.
Top of Form
4. Identify the evidence used to support Source #2’s main argument. )
In the textbox below, discuss the kinds of evidence used in the source to support the main argument and major points. Does the author use facts, statistics, experience, and/or authority? Use specific examples from the source.
5. Identify the reliability of evidence used to support Source #2’s main argument.
In the textbox below, discuss how you can tell the source uses reliable evidence. What makes each kind of evidence provided in the source reliable? Use specific examples from the source to demonstrate what makes the evidence reliable.
6. Identify how evidence is used to support counterargument in Source #2.
In the textbox below, first identify where the author presents a counterargument.
Second, describe how the author rebuts the counterargument.
Third, describe the evidence used in this rebuttal.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more