Details:
Data integrity is imperative to all facets of sports business. The data related to fan engagement (e.g., ticket purchases, concessions, and merchandising), sponsors, players and coaches, and other entities must be protected against potential fraud and other risks. Select one of the previously discussed components of sports analytics from this course. Analyze the potential ethical dilemmas that may arise with improper data management strategies. Write a 750-1,000-word paper that explores ethical issues in data privacy.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Data Integrity Paper
|
1
Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2
Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3
Satisfactory 79.00% |
4
Good 87.00% |
5
Excellent 100.00% |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.0 %Content
|
||||||
|
35.0 %Data Management Challenges
|
A topic is not selected from this course and a there is no analysis provided for the potential ethical dilemmas that may arise with improper data management.
|
This is either a topic from this course selected without an analysis of the potential ethical dilemmas that may arise with improper data management; or the topic selected is not from this course.
|
A topic is selected from this course with a general analysis of the potential ethical dilemmas that may arise with improper data management.
|
A topic is selected from this course and a detailed analysis of the potential ethical dilemmas that may arise with improper data management is provided. More details are needed in the description about the challenges associated with compliance.
|
A topic is selected from this course and a thorough analysis of the potential ethical dilemmas that may arise with improper data management is provided. Excellent details are included in the description about the challenges associated with compliance.
|
|
|
35.0 %Decision-Making Processes
|
There are no decision-making processes included or referenced.
|
The decision-making process is vaguely discussed for either situations where data is compromised or ambiguous, but not both.
|
The decision-making process is generally described in both situations of compromise and ambiguity, but further details are needed. There is no reference to the Christian perspective.
|
The decision-making process is described for situations of compromise and ambiguity. A reference to the Christian perspective is also provided.
|
The decision-making process for situations where data is compromised and in situations of ambiguity is thoroughly described and includes an insightful description of addressing the dilemmas from a Christian perspective.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
||||||
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
||||||
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
||||||
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more