Participation Response to my friend Yanilda Peralta

I need the same expert.transtutors.com/experts/writing/david-adams/”>David Adamswho is did my assignment aid #TTs300515_295234_23, now I want you to please make some comments in my peer
JUSTIN BASED IN WHAT HE WROTE IN THE SAME ASSIGNMENT THAT YOU ARE DOING IN
ORDER # 23.”
.cuny.edu/webapps/discussionboard/do/forum?action=list_threads&nav=discussion_board_entry&course_id=_1123576_1&conf_id=_1165153_1&forum_id=_1221662_1″>Laura
Kipnis. Against Love: A Treatise on the Tyranny of Two.”

Besides
posting your original reading responses, you are required to write at least one well thought out comment
to your classmates’ responses. Participation response should be at least 5
sentences long. You should clearly argue why exactly you agree or disagree with
another student, what is your point, and how can you support your argument.
When you respond to someone, you should address
his or her opinions, critiquing or supporting them with your own arguments. I’d
like to remind you that the comments should be no less than 5 sentences long:
otherwise it’s hard for me to grade them, since there just isn’t enough substance.

I want Half Page about what they wrote, well thought out comment
(participation response), saying if you agree or not and why? Try to write a
concise and meaningful response of about this size. The substantial amount of
text, that I request, should be dense and thorough. When you are going to write
a comment to someone’s response, explain why you agree or disagree and how you
came to those conclusions.

This is what my peerYanilda
Peralta wrote about the article:

”
.cuny.edu/webapps/discussionboard/do/forum?action=list_threads&nav=discussion_board_entry&course_id=_1123576_1&conf_id=_1165153_1&forum_id=_1221662_1″>Laura Kipnis. Against Love: A Treatise on the
Tyranny of Two.”Expert you are suppose to make a comment in
what my peerYanilda
Peraltawrote. Based
on the assignment that you did for me in order # 23 .
The name of the article is:”.cuny.edu/webapps/discussionboard/do/forum?action=list_threads&nav=discussion_board_entry&course_id=_1123576_1&conf_id=_1165153_1&forum_id=_1221662_1″>Laura Kipnis. Against Love: A Treatise on the
Tyranny of Two.” You have to read my peer response and the response that you did
for me in assignment # 23. And you have to make a comment saying if you agree
or not with my peer and why? Try to write a concise and meaningful response of
about this size. The substantial amount of text, that I request, should be
dense and thorough. When you are going to write a comment to someone’s
response, explain why you agree or disagree and how you came to those
conclusions.
Also Make some paragraphs do not put everything
together, and if you are citing you have to do it in AAA Style.

Response to Laura
Kipnis, Against Love A Treatise on the Tyranny of Two
In the essay “Against Love A
Treatise on the Tyranny of Two,” Laura Kipnis states that the only way to
achieve a long lasting relationship, couples must be able to adapt and obey
each other’s rules. She points out the stages of getting a long lasting
modern love relationship. By mutuality, then advanced intimacy, where couples
open themselves, and follow rules.

The dictatorship in the modern love relationship, doesn’t really work, I’m a
freedom lover. I have realized no one is looking to control or to be
controlled, and people who like to control others are not actually willing to
be controlled. It seems that 14 years after Kipnis, situations have changed in
America. Even though I agree that there should be mutuality and intimacy in a
relationship, I also think that there should be tolerance, comprehension and
acceptance. Accept the others how they are, comprehend that others behave in
some ways, and tolerant to others opinions. However having an unlimited set of
amendments to obey in order to be with someone doesn’t really work anymore,
unless those commands have a fair reason. People are not pets, which would be
rewarded once they do what their masters ask them to do. Yes, we want our
partners to be happy, but if we don’t ask them for anything out of the nowhere,
we (I in specifically) expect the same from them, if they start complaining of
my ways of being even though that was how they met me, and they cannot accept
me how I am, then it’s time to say good bye, that relationship won’t work for
me, more if that person put a list of 100 conditions that I would have to
follow, while I was never interested on putting condition to that partner. I
won’t follow my partner’s incoherent orders, like for example closing up all my
social network accounts, if there is no trust in my partner for me, then there
is not any love in my partner for me, just a sense of object possession. My
partner must understand that I have a life apart from my partner, and that he
can trust me because I’m loyal.

Some religions consider the women need to be yielded to their husbands; I want
some kind of equality between women and man. Freedom and harmony while being
together, that’s what I want. In an article by David J. Stewart, saying that
wives must obey their husbands in everything, and in his lines
he’s accusing feminism for the divorce of many people in America (Stewart),
this religious man for me seems to be so wrong, taking the bible to accuse
feminism of evil. I think that this era has allowed women to be more
independent, and reasonable. Just because we were born with a female sex,
doesn’t mean that we have to become puppets of the society, there should be
more equality. That religious guy seemed to be more devilish that holy from my
point of view. Still there are biblical passages that disagree with this man’s
point of view, like Vickie Kraft points out in her article, the story of
Abigail she helped David and disobeyed her husband’s orders to let David and
his men starve, God rewarded Abigail (Kraft 2007), wives should obey their
husbands when their husbands has a valid reason for his order.
Bibliograhy
Kraft, Vickie

2007 Lesson 5: The Truth About Submission. Bible.org 6/16/2015
.org/seriespage/lesson-5-truth-about-submission”>https://bible.org/seriespage/lesson-5-truth-about-submission

Stewart, David J.

n.d. A Christian Wife is to Obey Her Husband in EVERY THING! .jesus-is-savior.com/”>www.jesus-is-savior.com, evils in
America, feminism. 6/16/2015
.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Feminism/everything.htm”>http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Feminism/everything.