MGT559 module 5 case and SLP

Module 5 -HomeStrategy ImplementationAssignmentIn Module 5, we will conclude the case study process by researching the Kraft Foods Group’sstrategic controls and their fit with the company’s chosen strategy.Keys to the AssignmentStep One: Review your Case papers from Modules 1-4 so that you are familiar with the mission, vision, SWOT, strategy, and strategic choices you have identified over the course of the class.Step Two: Research the structure, systems, people, and culture at the Kraft Foods Group. Use the responses you provided in the SLP as a guideline. You will not be able to get answers to every single question, but you will need to answer at least one or two for each component.Step Three: Describe the Kraft Foods Group’sorganizational design, key strategic control systems, primary human resources concerns, and cultural factors, and the effect that these have had on the implementation of the Kraft Foods Group’sstrategy.Step Four: In a 5- to 7-page paper, criticallyevaluate the fit—or the lack of fit—between the company’s mission, strategy, and organizational components crucial to implementation. Do these components complement the strategy? Why or why not?Step Five: What changes would you—as the CEO—make to better assure the success of the company’s strategy?Step Six:Consider the Case as a formal business report that you are developing for the Board of Directors and CEO as the Kraft Foods Group’sconsultant. This is a professional document. Follow the format below: Executive summary: This is a synopsis of the main points, conclusions and recommendations made in the longer report. If you would like a refresher on writing an executive summary, check this website:.highendfinance.com/CommercialLoans/Docs/07-4%20ES%20Guidelines.doc”>http://www.highendfinance.com/CommercialLoans/Docs/07-4%20ES%20Guidelines.docIntroduction:State the main purpose of the paper (thesis statement), what you hope to accomplish, and how you will go about doing it.Main Body: The “meat” of the paper. Emphasize analysis, not just description. Delineate separate topics or sections with headings.Conclusion: Summarize your paper in the light of your thesis statement.Assignment ExpectationsModule 5 -SLPAssignmentIn this module, we will be completing our strategic toolkit by researching sources of information about these components as they relate specifically to the Kraft Foods Group.Your assignment is to find information about the following organizational components discussed in this module as they relate specifically to the Kraft Foods Group. Do your best notto speculate but to find factual information concerning the topical areas below. The following list of questions may help you focus your search (source: Obtaining information about organizational components critical to implementation [adapted from Aaker, D.A. (2001) Developing Business Strategies. Wiley]): StructureWhat is the organization’s structure? How decentralized or centralized is it?What are the lines of authority and communication?What are the roles of teams, committees, and task forces?SystemsHow are budgets set?How is planning done?What measures are used to evaluate performance?PeopleWhat are the skills, experience, and knowledge of the firm’s employees?What is their depth and quality?What are their attitudes about the company and their jobs?CultureWhat are the company’s values and are they widely shared and accepted by employees?What are the key norms of behavior?What are some significant symbols?What is the dominant management style?How is conflict resolved?Keys to the AssignmentStep One: Review the questions above and do some research to see where you could find answers to them. You may not be able to answer all of the questions, but try to find at least one source per component that addresses most of its characteristics.Step Two: Create a 3- to 4-page list of sources and indicate what information each one provides for each component. Evaluate each source in terms of its objectivity, reliability, and truthfulness.Assignment ExpectationsYour paper will be evaluated on the following points:Precision – Does the paper address the question(s) or task(s)?Breadth – Is the full breadth of the subject (i.e., the Keys to the Assignment) addressed? Depth – Does the paper address the topic in sufficient depth and include the Background reading and other Background resources as references?Critical thinking – Is the subject thought about critically, that is, accurately, logically, relevantly, and precisely?Clarity – Is the writing clear and are the concepts articulated properly? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding to the questions or are points conveyed through excessive use of quotations?Organization – Is the paper well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are headings included in all papers longer than two pages?Referencing (citations and references) – Does the paper include citations and quotation marks where appropriate? Are the references from the Background reading and assignment present and properly cited? Are all the references listed in the bibliography present and referred to via citation?Application – Are the concepts of the module appropriately applied to the subject?