Home » strategic Appli in project management

strategic Appli in project management

 

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Reflection and Discussion Forum Week 14

Reflection and Discussion Forum Week 14Assigned Readings:Chapter. 14 Project ClosureInitial Postings: Read and reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Then post what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding in each assigned textbook chapter.Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion.Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:

  1. Imagine you are conducting a review of the International Space Station project. Research press coverage and the Internet to collect information on the current status of the project. What are the successes and failures to date? What forecasts would you make about the completion of the project, and why? What recommendations would you make to top management of the program, and why?

[Your post must be substantive and demonstrate insight gained from the course material. Postings must be in the student’s own words – do not provide quotes!] [Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review] 

 

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Activity 14

Interview a project manager who works for an organization that implements multiple projects. Ask the manager what kind of closure procedures are used to complete a project and whether lessons learned are used.Present a brief report of your interview. 

Chapter Fourteen

Project Closure

14–1

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–2

Where We Are Now

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–2
Project Management 6e.

Learning Objectives
Identify different types of project closure
Understand the challenges of closing out a project
Explain the importance of a project audit
Know ho to use project retrospectives to obtain lessons learned
Assess level of project management maturity
Provide useful advice for conducting team performance reviews
Provide useful advice for conducting performance reviews of project members
14–3

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter Outline
14.1 Types of Project Closure
14.2 Wrap-up Closure Activities
14.3 Project Audits
14.4 Post-Implementation Evaluation
14–4

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–5
Project Closure and Review Deliverables
FIGURE 14.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–5
Project Management 6e.

14–6
Project Closure
Types of Project Closure
Normal
Premature
Perpetual
Failed Project
Changed Priority
Close-out Plan: Questions to be Asked
What tasks are required to close the project?
Who will be responsible for these tasks?
When will closure begin and end?
How will the project be delivered?
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–6
Project Management 6e.

14–7
Wrap-up Closure Checklist
TABLE 14.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–7
Project Management 6e.

14–8
Implementing Project Closedown
Getting delivery acceptance from the customer
Shutting down resources and releasing them to new uses
Reassigning project team members
Closing accounts and seeing all bills are paid
Delivering the project to the customer
Creating a final report

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–8
Project Management 6e.

Project Audits
Examine project success and review why the project was selected.
Include a reassessment of the project’s role in the organization’s priorities.
Include a check on the organizational culture and external factors.
When to perform the project audits:
In-process project audits
Concentrate on project progress and performance.
Perform early in projects to allow corrective changes.
Post-project audits
Emphasize on improving the management of future projects.
Include more detail and depth than in-process project audits.
14–9

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Guidelines for Conducting a Project Audit
The philosophy must be that the project audit is not a witch hunt.
Comments about individuals or groups participating in the project should be minimized.
Audit activities should be sensitive to human emotions and reactions.
Accuracy of data should be verifiable.
Senior management should announce support for the project audit.
The objective of project audits is not to prosecute but to learn and conserve valuable organization resources where mistakes have been made.
The audit should be completed as quickly as is reasonable.
14–10

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

The Project Audit Process
Initiating and Staffing
Depends primarily on organization and project size
The outcome must represent an independent, outside view of the project.
Data Collection and Analysis
Gather information and data to answer questions from:
Organization view
Project team view
Reporting
The report attempts to capture needed changes and lessons learned from a current or finished project.
14–11

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

A Common Outline for Project Audit Reports
Classification
Project type
Size
Number of staff
Technical level
Strategic or support
Analysis
Project mission and objectives
Procedures and systems used
Organization resources used
Outcomes achieved
14–12
Recommendations
Technical improvements
Corrective actions
Lessons Learned
Reminders
Retrospectives
Appendix
Backup data
Critical information

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Project Retrospectives
Retrospectives
Denote specific efforts at identifying lessons learned on projects.
An Independent Facilitator
Guides the project team through the analysis project activities.
Uses several questionnaires focusing on project operations and on how the organization’s culture impacted project success and failures.
Visits one-on-one with project participants to dive deeper into cause-effect impacts.
Leads a team retrospective session.
Works with the team to develop a system that prioritize information for different recipients.
14–13

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–14
TABLE 14.2
Were the project objectives and strategic intent of the project clearly and explicitly communicated?
Were the objectives and strategy in alignment?
Were the stakeholders identified and included in the planning?
Were project resources adequate for this project?
Were people with the right skill sets assigned to this project?
Were time estimates reasonable and achievable?
Were the risks for the project appropriately identified and assessed before the project started?
Were the processes and practices appropriate for this type of project? Should projects of similar size and type use these systems? Why/why not?
Did outside contractors perform as expected? Explain.
Were communication methods appropriate and adequate among all stakeholders? Explain.
Is the customer satisfied with the project product?
Are the customers using the project deliverables as intended? Are they satisfied?
Were the project objectives met?
Are the stakeholders satisfied their strategic intents have been met?
Has the customer or sponsor accepted a formal statement that the terms of the project charter and scope have been met?
Were schedule, budget, and scope standards met?
Is there any one important area that needs to be reviewed and improved upon? Can you identify the cause?
Project Process Review Questionnaire
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–14
Project Management 6e.

14–15
Organizational Culture Review Questionnaire
TABLE 14.3
Was the organizational culture supportive for this type of project?
Was senior management support adequate?
Were people with the right skills assigned to this project?
Did the project office help or hinder management of the project? Explain.
Did the team have access to organizational resources (people, funds, equipment)?
Was training for this project adequate? Explain.
Were lessons learned from earlier projects useful? Why? Where?
Did the project have a clear link to organizational objectives? Explain.
Was project staff properly reassigned?
Was the Human Resources Office helpful in finding new assignments? Comment.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–15
Project Management 6e.

Project Management Maturity Model
14–16
FIGURE 14.2

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–17
Post-Implementation Evaluation
Reasons for Poor-Quality Project Performance Evaluations:
Evaluations of individuals are left to supervisors of the team member’s home department.
Typical measures of team performance center on time, cost, and specifications.

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–17
Project Management 6e.

14–18
Pre-Implementation Conditions: Team
Do standards for measuring performance exist? (You can’t manage what you can’t measure.) Are the goals clear for the team and individuals? Challenging? Attainable? Lead to positive consequences?
Are individual and team responsibilities and performance standards known by all team members?
Are team rewards adequate? Do they send a clear signal that senior management believes that the synergy of teams is important?
Is a clear career path for successful project managers in place?
Is the team empowered to manage short-term difficulties?
Is there a relatively high level of trust emanating from the organization culture?
Are there criteria beyond time, cost, and specifications?

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–18
Project Management 6e.

14–19
Sample Team Evaluation and Feedback Survey
TABLE 14.4
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–19
Project Management 6e.

14–20
Project Performance Evaluation: Individual
Performance Assessment Responsibilities:
Functional organization or functional matrix: the individual’s area manager.
The area manager may solicit the project manager’s opinion of the individual’s performance on a specific project.
Balanced matrix: the project manager and the area manager jointly evaluate an individual’s performance.
Project matrix and project organizations: the project manager is responsible for appraising individual performance.

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–20
Project Management 6e.

14–21
Conducting Performance Reviews
Begin by asking the individual to evaluate his or her own performance.
Avoid drawing comparisons with other team members; rather, assess the individual in terms of established standards and expectations.
Focus criticism on specific examples of behavior rather than on the individual personally.
Be consistent and fair in treatment of all team members.
Treat the review as one point in an ongoing process.

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–21
Project Management 6e.

14–22
Individual Performance Assessment
Multiple rater appraisal (360-degree feedback)
The objective is to identify areas for individual improvement.
Involves soliciting feedback concerning team members’ performance from all of the people that their work affects.
Project managers, area managers, peers, subordinates, and customers

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–22
Project Management 6e.

14–23
Key Terms
Lessons learned
Performance review
Project closure
Project evaluation
Project facilitator
Retrospective
Team evaluation
360-degree review
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–23
Project Management 6e.

Project Closeout Checklist
14–24
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–24
Project Management 6e.

14–25
Project Closeout Checklist
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–25
Project Management 6e.

14–26
Project Closeout Checklist (cont’d)

Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–26
Project Management 6e.

Euro Conversion—Project Closure Checklist
14–27
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–27
Project Management 6e.

14–28
Euro Conversion—Project Closure Checklist
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

14–28
Project Management 6e.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Live Chat+1 763 309 4299EmailWhatsApp

We Can Handle your Online Class from as low as$100 per week