Reflection journal

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

week 5 so is number 5 

Rubric reflective journal

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Rubric

Collapse All Professional Capstone And Practicum Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All

New Practice Approaches

0 points

Criteria Description

New Practice Approaches

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporate additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present, but they are incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are not present.

Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)

0 points
Criteria Description
Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is not present.

Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems

0 points
Criteria Description
Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)

0 points
Criteria Description
Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is not present.

Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)

0 points
Criteria Description
Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is not present.

Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)

0 points
Criteria Description
Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is not present.

Population Health Concerns

0 points
Criteria Description
Population Health Concerns
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is not present.

Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)

0 points
Criteria Description
Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.

Health Policy

0 points
Criteria Description
Health Policy
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Health policy information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Health policy information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Health policy information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Health policy information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Health policy information is not present.

Leadership and Economic Models

0 points
Criteria Description
Leadership and Economic Models
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is not present.

Health Disparities

0 points
Criteria Description
Health Disparities
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Information on health disparities is present Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Information on health disparities is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Information on health disparities is not present.

Outline of Overall Personal Discovery

0 points
Criteria Description
Outline of Overall Personal Discovery
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good
0 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.