Responses to Discussion 4

 you need to complete at least two responses (the “Final Posts”) of at least 200 words each to classmates by the dates shown in the course schedule.

First Post:

The lives of blameless men, ladies, and kids quieted in view of firearm utilize. Perhaps we can quit being childish and look past ourselves. Possibly we should take a gander at the lives of these guiltless regular citizens. One day, our siblings or sisters may be on the news. One day your child or little girl may never return home from school. At that point we ask ourselves, why? For what reason did this transpire ; since we were narrow minded. Since we were blinded by our materialistic needs, and did not gain from the missteps society had officially made. Since, at last, we weren’t man enough to put others before ourselves. We have to limit firearms keeping in mind the end goal to make it more troublesome for culprits, or anybody so far as that is concerned, to acquire them. It is terrifying to think how simple it is for anybody to get a grip of any sort of firearm. The second Amendment doesn’t make a difference like it used to, so anybody that tries to utilize that as a reason to claim firearms is battling for an acts of futility as I would like to think. This steady danger should be dealt with by making weapon controls substantially stricter.

Second Post:

Despite any counter-arguments, more reasons suggest that the United States government should not institute stricter gun control laws in America. This is because instituting stricter gun control measures can endanger the lives of innocent American citizens. Putting in place gun restriction laws may decrease the number of guns carried in America, but will only serve to take guns out of the hands of innocent people. As much as the gun restriction advocates may not want to believe it, an illegal gun market shall always counter their efforts to eradicate guns. With enough financial incentive, any unregulated market will find a way to obtain illegal items such as gun. So if the criminals can still find means to get guns, these laws will only be there to restrict honest and law abiding gun owners and make them targets for gun-trotting criminals. Let us not forget that the elimination or restriction of guns does not ultimately lead to the elimination of violence associated with guns. A person does not decide to murder someone just because they happen to have guns lying around. The criminal intents drive people to kill, and they will find a any means to achieve them, whether it involves guns or not.
Guns provide self-defense for the citizens of America, and studies show that if a criminal knows that any given person might hold a concealed gun, the crime and murder rates will decrease. Switzerland is an example. Guns, in the end, actually help keep citizens safe contrary to popular belief, and unnecessary restrictions on them will only place the innocent and the law-abiding citizens in the line of danger.